Fifteen years after its release, *The Devil Wears Prada* continues to captivate audiences. Its sharp wit, memorable characters, and iconic fashion moments have cemented its place in cinematic history. While Meryl Streep's Miranda Priestly rightfully commands much of the discussion, a quieter, more insidious villain lurked in the background: Nate Cooper, played by Adrian Grenier. In a recent Entertainment Weekly exclusive 15-year anniversary oral history video, Grenier himself finally addresses the long-standing debate surrounding his character's role in the film’s narrative, acknowledging Nate's undeniable villainy. This retrospective delves into Grenier's reflections, analyzing the character of Nate and exploring the reasons why audiences, and now even Grenier himself, see him as the true antagonist of *The Devil Wears Prada*.
'Devil Wears Prada' Star Adrian Grenier Admits Nate Was the… Well, You Know
For years, discussions surrounding *The Devil Wears Prada* focused primarily on the cutthroat world of high fashion and Miranda Priestly's tyrannical reign. Anne Hathaway's Andy Sachs, navigating the treacherous waters of her new job, was the clear protagonist. However, as time passed, a growing consensus emerged, pointing to Nate Cooper's passive-aggressive actions and self-absorbed behavior as the true source of conflict in Andy's life. Grenier's recent admission in EW's oral history solidifies this perspective, adding a layer of self-awareness and retrospective analysis to the already complex character dynamics. His candid acknowledgment isn’t merely a confession; it's a validation of a long-held fan theory. He finally gives voice to what many viewers instinctively felt: Nate wasn't just a flawed boyfriend; he was the antagonist actively undermining Andy's professional growth and personal happiness.
Adrian Grenier on Nate as the Real Villain of *The Devil Wears Prada
Grenier's comments in the EW video offer a fascinating insight into his own interpretation of the character fifteen years later. He likely didn't fully grasp the depth of Nate's villainy during filming. The film's focus is primarily on Andy's professional journey, and Nate's role might have seemed secondary at the time. However, with the benefit of hindsight and the collective wisdom of years of fan discussion, Grenier acknowledges the full weight of Nate's actions. He likely realized how his character's constant disapproval, passive-aggressive criticisms, and lack of support actively hindered Andy’s progress. Nate’s actions weren't overtly malicious, but their cumulative effect was devastating for Andy's self-esteem and professional ambitions.
Adrian Grenier: I Was the Villain in *Devil Wears Prada
This statement, though perhaps hyperbolic in its bluntness, encapsulates the core of the argument. While Miranda is undeniably a powerful and demanding boss, her actions are largely confined to the professional sphere. Nate, on the other hand, undermines Andy on both professional and personal levels. He consistently dismisses her aspirations, belittles her career choices, and ultimately sabotages her pursuit of success. This is far more insidious than Miranda's overt criticism, making Nate's actions all the more damaging and, ultimately, villainous. Grenier's admission highlights this crucial distinction. He understands now that Nate’s subtle undermining was far more harmful than any direct confrontation from Miranda.
current url：https://vmqzzp.e171z.com/global/adrian-grenier-in-devil-wears-prada-37010
burberry charles tonal horseferry check belt sale gucci watches ladies